Digital Recruitment and Onboarding in Human Resource Management. Practices, Challenges, and Strategic Implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56177/12icmie2025.166Keywords:
recruitment, onboarding, digitalization, flexibility, retention, human resources, employee experienceAbstract
The fast digitalization of Human Resource Management (HRM) has changed recruitment and onboarding a lot. What used to be mostly paperwork is now a set of powerful tools that influence how candidates see a company, how fast they become productive, and even if they decide to stay long-term. In this paper, we look at both research and practical examples to show how technology, flexibility, and people-focused approaches are reshaping these processes. Digital platforms and AI tools help companies reach more candidates and reduce the time needed to hire. At the same time, they also bring up some tough questions about bias and fairness, which cannot be ignored. Onboarding today is more than just first-day introductions. It is about giving employees clear roles, support from managers, proper training, and access to mentorship. When done well, onboarding has a strong impact on early retention. The rise of hybrid and remote work has also made flexibility not just a “nice to have,” but something employees expect. This flexibility is closely connected to well-being, productivity, and engagement. In the end, the study argues that organizations need to balance the smart use of technology with empathy in process design. Fairness, inclusiveness, and flexibility should stay at the center of recruitment and onboarding. Looking ahead, future research should pay more attention to transparent and auditable AI systems, more personalized onboarding journeys, and long-term studies on how employees integrate and develop inside organizations.
References
Raghavan, M.; Barocas, S.; Kleinberg, J.; Levy, K. (2019). Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3408010
Cucolaș, A.-A.; Russo, D. (2021). Supporting psychological needs in remote work: a model for onboarding and project success. Available from :
Day, D. V.; Dragoni, L. (2015). Leadership development: An outcome-oriented review. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. Available from
Hutajulu, R. S. (2020). The effect of Work From Home on motivation and performance. Available from:
https://jonuns.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1508
Smollan, R. K.; Morrison, R. L.; Cooper-Thomas, H. D. (2023). Working from home during lockdown: Effects on performance and well-being. Available from:
Halbesleben, J. R. B.; Neveu, J.-P.; Paustian-Underdahl, S. C.; Westman, M. (2014). Getting to the 'COR': Conservation of Resources theory in organizational behavior. Journal of Management. Available from:
https://en-coller.tau.ac.il/sites/nihul_en.tau.ac.il/files/RP-290_Westman.pdf
Hobfoll, S. E. (2018). Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. Available from:
https://www.scribd.com/document/461362671/Hobfoll-et-al-2018-pdf
Hobfoll, S. E. (2012). Conservation of resources and disaster in cultural context: The psychology of resource loss and resource gain. Available from:
Kanstrén, T.; Mäkelä, L. (2020). Expatriate well-being: A meta-analytic review. Available from:
Doğan, N.; Demirtaş, O. (2008). Talent management: a strategic approach.
Babbie, E. (2010). The Practice of Social Research. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Chelcea, S. (2001). Metodologia cercetării sociologice. Editura Economică.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cristian Vasile GHIȚĂ, Dragoș-Oliviu ȘERBAN, Alexandru MARIN, Laura-Florentina BOANȚĂ

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.