ANNUAL Report and Sustainability Report: a Theoretical proposal for an Integrated Reporting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56177/12icmie2025.95Keywords:
Business Ethics, ESG Reporting, Ethical Reporting, Ethical Accountability, Sustainability Report.Abstract
The objective of the article is to propose a theorization regarding ethical reporting and the proposal – particularly relevant for listed companies – consists in reporting to investors and to stakeholders the ESG performances measured through an accounting model in which, on the one hand, sustainability reporting can acquire from the annual report the accounting information necessary for the drafting of its documents and, on the other hand, it is able to return the environmental, social and governance performances in the annual report, thus influencing the accounting results contained in the document.
The novelty of the model derives from the fact that in current documents and in those relating to the ethical reporting model (such as, for example, the social report, the environmental report, the sustainability report, etc.) the information flow from the annual report to the sustainability report is unidirectional (the directionality is from the annual report to the sustainability report). In other words, the accounting data included in the annual report has never been directly influenced by the information provided by non-financial reporting (or sustainability reporting): the only identifiable connection has been in the use of the sustainability reports of some quantitative data produced by the accounting records: the theoretical model therefore proposes a bidirectional connection between traditional accounting information and ethical information.
The topics of the paper are addressed to a heterogeneous audience of subjects made up of academic researchers, stakeholders and shareholders: for academic researchers the implications of the paper should serve to create a new theoretical model of connection between annual report and sustainability report disclosure; for stakeholders the model could provide greater transparency in financial reporting, which is particularly significant in companies listed on stock exchanges and for shareholders the proposal could provide a significant revaluation of the financial investments made.
References
United Nations (U.N.): Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future, United Nations, New York (USA), (1987). Available from https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/139811?v=pdf. Accessed: 2025-05-09
National Board of Certified Public Accountants (trans. Consiglio Nazionale dei Dottori Commercialisti e degli Esperti Contabili) (CNDCEC): Il glossario economico ambientale e di sostenibilità (trans.: The economic, environmental and sustainability glossary), CNDCEC, Rome (IT), (2009). Available from https://www.odcec.roma.it/attachments/333_SOC_ENTI_IND_PROF_Cndcec_Gloss_amb.pdf. Accessed: 2025-05-09
Elkington, J.: Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development, California Management Review, Vol. 36 (1994), No. 2, pp. 90-100, ISNN 2162-8564
Elkington, J.: Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business, Environmental Quality Management, Vol. 8 (1998), No. 1, pp. 37-51, ISNN 1520-6483
Savitz, A.W.; Weber, K.: The Triple Bottom Line: How Today's Best-Run Companies Are Achieving Economic, Social, and Environmental Success-and How You Can Too, Jossey-Bass Inc Pub, ISBN 9780787979072, Hoboken, New Jersey, (USA), (2006)
Carroll, A.B.: A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4 (1979), No. 4, pp. 497-505, ISNN 0363-7425
Carroll, A.B.: Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look, International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Vol. 1 (2016), No. 3, ISNN 2366-0074
Sethi, S.P.: Dimensions of Corporate Social Responsibility, California Management Review, Vol. 17 (1975), No. 3, pp. 58-64, ISNN 2162-8564
European Commission (E.C.): Green Paper: Towards a European strategy for the security of energy supply, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (LU), (2000). Available from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/0ef8d03f-7c54-41b6-ab89-6b93e61fd37c/language-en. Accessed: 2025-05-09
Bueno, N. et al.: The Eu directive on corporate sustainability due diligence (Csddd): the final political compromise. Business and Human Rights Journal, Vol. 9 (2024), No. 2, pp. 294-300, ISNN 2057-0198
McCullagh, V.: The EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive: Real Change or More of the Same? European Business Law Review, Vol. 35 (2024), No. 5, pp. 603-626, ISNN 0959-6941
Hugos, M.H.: Essentials of supply chain management, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 9781119461104, Hoboken, New Jersey, (USA), (2024)
Namdar, J. et al.: Diversify or Concentrate? Supply chain responses to policy uncertainty. Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 61 (2025), No. 1, pp. 62-82, ISSN 1523-2409
Porter, M.: Supply chain integration: does organizational culture matter? Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol.12 (2019), No.1, pp. 49-59, ISSN 1979-3561
Armstrong, A.: Ethics and ESG. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, Vol. 14 (2020), No. 3, pp. 6-17, ISNN 1834-2019
Landi, G., Sciarelli, M.: Towards a more ethical market: the impact of ESG rating on corporate financial performance. Social responsibility journal, Vol. 15 (2019), No. 1, pp. 11-27, ISNN 1747-1117
Leins, S.: “Responsible investment”: ESG and the post-crisis ethical order. Economy and society, Vol. 49 (2020), No. 1, pp. 71-91, ISNN 0308-5147
Garcia-Torea, N. et al.: The EU Taxonomy, sustainability reporting and financial institutions: understanding the elements driving regulatory uncertainty. Accounting Forum, Vol. 48 (2024), No. 3, pp. 427-454), ISNN 1467-6303
Kooths, S.: EU taxonomy: Mission impossible. The Economists’ Voice, Vol. 19 (2023), No. 2, pp. 243-249, ISNN 1553-3832
Nipper, M. et al.: Mandatory disclosure of standardized sustainability metrics: The case of the EU Taxonomy Regulation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 32 (2025), No. 2, pp. 2171-2190, ISNN 1535-3966
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Massimo POLLIFRONI, Gheorghe MILITARU, Ionela Luminita CANUTA(BUCUROIU), Francesco POLLIFRONI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
