The influence of cultural dimensions and generational differences on sustainable behavior in organizations - a systematic literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56177/12icmie2025.131Keywords:
cultural dimensions, generational differences, sustainable behavior, organizational culture, corporate sustainability, multigenerational workforce.Abstract
Sustainable behavior in organizations has become a strategic priority amid global environmental challenges and the objectives of the UN’s sustainability agenda. Cultural dimensions, such as collectivism versus individualism, power distance, and long-term orientation, and generational cohorts are key influences on how organizations and employees engage with sustainability. While numerous studies explore these factors separately, their combined impact remains underexplored. This article addresses that gap by conducting a systematic literature review on how cultural values and generational differences jointly shape sustainable behavior in organizations. The review draws on peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2025 in Web of Science and Scopus-indexed journals in the fields of business, management, and organizational studies. Selection criteria included empirical or theoretical studies linking at least one cultural dimension or generational aspect to sustainability-related organizational behaviors. The methodology followed PRISMA guidelines to ensure a transparent and replicable process. Findings indicate that cultural values significantly influence organizational sustainability outcomes. Cultures characterized by collectivism, egalitarianism, long-term orientation, and a concern for quality of life tend to promote environmental responsibility and social engagement. In contrast, highly hierarchical or materially driven cultures may require institutional reinforcement to adopt sustainable practices. At the same time, organizations with internal cultures that emphasize sustainability - through leadership support, employee involvement, and value alignment - report improved environmental performance. Generational differences further shape sustainability engagement. Millennials and Generation Z typically demonstrate stronger pro-environmental attitudes and expectations from employers, acting as change agents within organizations. However, the effect of generational differences is mediated by cultural context, making it essential to tailor sustainability strategies accordingly. This article contributes an integrative conceptual model and identifies research gaps, offering practical insights for managers to align sustainability initiatives with the cultural and generational profiles of their workforce.
References
Hristov, I., & Chirico, A. (2023). The cultural dimension as a key value driver of the sustainable development at a strategic level: An integrated five-dimensional approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25, 7011–7028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02345-z
United Nations. (n.d.). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Geert Hofstede Website. (n.d.). The 6 dimensions model of national culture. Retrieved from https://geerthofstede.com
Husted, B. W. (2005). Culture and ecology: A cross-national study of the determinants of environmental sustainability. Management International Review, 45(3), 349–371. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40836056
Pinkston, T. S., & Carroll, A. B. (1994). Corporate citizenship perspectives and foreign direct investment in the US. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(3), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02074814
Burton, B. K., Farh, J.-L., & Hegarty, W. H. (2000). A cross-cultural comparison of corporate social responsibility orientation: Hong Kong vs. United States students. Teaching Business Ethics, 4, 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009862130160
Waldman, D. A., Siegel, D. S., Javidan, M., & the GLOBE Collaborators. (2006). Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1703–1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00642.x
Jamali, D. (2008). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9572-4
Ringov, D., & Zollo, M. (2007). The impact of national culture on corporate social performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 7(4), 476–485. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700710820551
Kim, Y., & Kim, S. Y. (2010). The influence of cultural values on perceptions of corporate social responsibility: Application of Hofstede’s dimensions to Korean public relations practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 485–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0095-z
Ho, F. N., Wang, H. M. D., & Vitell, S. J. (2012). A global analysis of corporate social performance: The effects of cultural and geographic environments. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1047-y
Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America's future, 1584 to 2069. William Morrow & Co.
Nichols, B. S., & Holt, J. W. (2023). A comparison of sustainability attitudes and intentions across generations and gender: A perspective from U.S. consumers. Management Letters / Cuadernos de Gestión, 23(1), 51–62. http://hdl.handle.net/10810/59433
Olsson, D., & Gericke, N. (2017). The effect of gender on students’ sustainability consciousness: A nationwide Swedish study. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(5), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2017.1310083
United Nations Development Programme. (2020). Human development report 2020: The next frontier – Human development and the Anthropocene. United Nations Development Programme. https://hdr.undp.org/
Park, H., Russell, C., & Lee, J. (2007). National culture and environmental sustainability: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Economics and Finance, 31, 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02751516
Cox, P., Friedman, B., & Tribunella, T. (2011). Relationships among World Governance Indicators and national per capita income weighted by environmental sustainability. BRC Journal of Advances in Business, 1(2), 37–54.
Hristov, I., Chirico, A., & Appolloni, A. (2019). Sustainability value creation, survival, and growth of the company: A critical perspective in the sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC). Sustainability, 11(7), 2119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072119
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Galina LISA, Marian JALENCU, Irina COSNICEAN

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.